Restating the Plot in Films

“Show, don’t tell.” That’s been a timeless rule of thumb for writing—screenplays and anything else. But now, according to Matt Damon, Netflix is asking for the plot in movies to be restated numerously to make sure distracted audiences are still following.

Filmmakers in the past have assumed that if someone was watching their movie, they were paying attention. That has never been less true, and I don’t think that will ever become more true. We watch movies on the big screen while scrolling on the small one in our hands. Even though we can “multitask”, we’re unable to focus on both. So now, Netflix is trying to reach these half-engaged audiences by spelling things out clearly and blatantly.

Two things come to mind.

First, YouTube. YouTubers have never had the luxury of people’s automatic attention. So they learned how to write, edit, and produce videos that keep the viewer interested and watching. One reason for this is that YouTubers have clear metrics that tell them whether people are paying attention, and they have tangible consequences that depend on it. As a result, they have become masters of balancing story and engagement. Filmmakers—if they haven’t already—will have to begin to learn these skills and adapt their art in a way that engages their viewers—without spelling things out for them like they’re five years old.

Second, if this trend continues, we will see a flood of movies that lack depth and emotional weight because executives are making sure there’s a recap ever ten minutes. This will result in generally “bad” movies. This will also allow space for masterpieces of true art and emotion; films that are catered for the few that purposefully watch films and perhaps even enjoy them in a theater. Lights always shine brighter in the dark, and if traditional Hollywood is going to dampen their work by restating the plot, then internet filmmakers and indie moviemakers will have all the more chance to shine!

I’d love to hear what my fellow screenwriters, filmmakers, and movie enthusiasts think about this.

2 Likes

This is a very interesting observation. While I agree that catering to audiences that have a phone in one hand and catering to algorithms that observe the 2- or 5-minute flick over switch is somewhat dampening, I still believe in two things:

  • filmmakers are entertainers. They always were and always will be.
  • fitting in with an algorithm-dominated distribution isn’t a difference in kind than fitting in with writing and directing and producing what audiences want. It is a difference in degree.
    Bond films, as an example, will ALWAYS re-state the plot and the stakes multiple times throughout the story every 10 minutes or so. That can still be done in a ‘show-don’t-tell’ way.
    I also feel that audiences are both smarter than we think and not as smart as we think. Effectively, the job of keeping audiences engaged hasn’t changed, it is just more acutely measured.
    I further feel that there is a big enough audience - people like me - who want alternative, indie, original films and we aren’t particularly well served by large streamers. That market is small. But it was always small. And we have to re-imagine the profitability of that route. But it never really has been fast-money, anyway.
    We are facing a change of degree, not kind, and while I agree the numbers have changed, I don’t think the fundamental challenges are different.
2 Likes

100% agree. At our core, we’re just trying to entertain… and also tell stories.

I wrote a cheeky screenplay (4 pages?) about last years Oscars - The Best Single Page Screenplay category. It’s not on this laptop but was a foretaste of this coming madness . . . .

Best –